Top 7 Viva Goals Alternatives for 2026 - And How to Migrate

Microsoft Viva Goals was permanently shut down on December 31, 2025. No grace period. No replacement within the Microsoft ecosystem. No recovery path for data left behind.

If your organization relied on Viva Goals to run OKRs, you're now operating without a strategy execution platform - or scrambling to evaluate replacements under pressure. Either way, the landscape has shifted significantly since the retirement announcement. Quantive, which many Viva Goals customers had shortlisted as a natural next step, was acquired by WorkBoard in May 2025 and is no longer an independent product.

This guide gives you an updated, 2026-ready view of the real alternatives: what they do, where they fall short, who they're built for, and how difficult the migration actually is. We also address the compliance question that matters most to European enterprises - because not every platform stores data in the EU or holds the certifications your procurement team will require.

Why Microsoft Retired Viva Goals (And What It Means for You)

Microsoft launched Viva Goals to empower teams through focused OKR-based goal management - but adoption across the Viva Suite customer base never reached the scale needed to justify continued investment, leading to the product's deprecation.

The product hit a feature freeze in December 2024. After December 31, 2025, the Viva Goals web app and Teams app went dark, and integrations - including Azure DevOps, Teams, and Power BI connectors - stopped working. Microsoft explicitly stated they will not replace Viva Goals with another solution or integrate its features into other Microsoft products.

This isn't just a product sunset - it's a signal. Microsoft is stepping back from the OKR space entirely and directing customers toward third-party vendors. The question is: which one is the right fit for your organization?

The State of the OKR Market in 2026

Before diving into the shortlist, two important market shifts affect your evaluation:

1. Quantive is no longer independent. WorkBoard acquired Quantive in May 2025, merging two of the largest enterprise OKR platforms. The standalone Quantive product is being phased out, and existing customers are migrating to WorkBoard's platform - often mid-cycle - facing new workflows, a different UX, and in many cases higher costs.

2. AI has become the dividing line. The platforms that have pulled ahead in 2026 moved beyond basic OKR tracking into AI-powered execution - generating goals, checking quality, automating reporting, and surfacing risk before quarterly reviews do.

The Top 7 Viva Goals Alternatives

1. Workpath - Best for DACH/EU Enterprises Needing Compliance and AI

What it is: Workpath is a Munich-based Outcome Management Platform that connects OKRs, KPIs, and strategic initiatives in a single AI-powered system built specifically for complex enterprise structures.

Key strengths:

• AI-first execution: OKR Generator, Quality Checker, and AI Agents help teams draft better goals, flag quality issues, and automate status reporting - without manual effort
• Full-spectrum analytics: The Analytics Suite delivers real-time dashboards, automated business reviews, and custom reporting across the entire organization
• Enterprise compliance: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, TISAX AL2, GDPR-compliant with all data hosted in German data centers - the strongest compliance profile of any OKR platform in this comparison
• Deep Microsoft integration: Native connectivity with Teams, Planner, Azure DevOps, Power BI, and Entra ID - keeping Viva Goals users in a familiar ecosystem
• Dedicated migration program: Free data migration, a 4-week trial pre-populated with your data, and free Microsoft integrations for the first year

Limitations: Enterprise-focused pricing (custom quotes); best suited for organizations above 200 users.

Migration ease: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Workpath offers a structured migration program for Viva Goals users with free data migration, dedicated success management, and zero commercial overlap during transition.

Best fit: Mid-to-large enterprises in DACH/EU, regulated industries (automotive, energy, manufacturing, logistics), and organizations needing full compliance documentation for procurement.

Real-world proof: DB Schenker improved its goal achievement rate by 17% after implementing OKR-based Outcome Management with Workpath - including measurable gains in transparency and strategic focus across a complex, global organization.

2. WorkBoard (formerly Quantive + WorkBoard) - Best for Fortune 500 Top-Down Execution

What it is: Following the acquisition of Quantive in May 2025, WorkBoard (now branded WorkBoardAI) positions itself as the enterprise strategy orchestration system for P&L-owning executives.

Key strengths:

• AI agents including a Digital Chief of Staff and Leadership Coach that generate weekly briefings, identify strategic risks, and coach leaders on execution
• Broad data connectivity - the combined entity offers 150+ connectors from the Quantive side
• Strong Microsoft 365 integration including a Copilot agent that brings OKRs directly into Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Outlook

Limitations: No public pricing; enterprise contracts are custom-quoted, with estimates around $35-50/user/month based on buyer reports. The interface is heavy and demands a strategy office driving adoption. The acquisition introduced potential data residency changes for EU-hosted accounts - a red flag for GDPR-sensitive organizations. No free trial.

Migration ease: ⭐⭐⭐ Managed enterprise onboarding, but expect 3-6 months and significant budget.

Best fit: Fortune 500 organizations that need board-ready reporting, have a dedicated strategy execution office, and whose compliance team is comfortable with US-based data hosting.

3. Perdoo - Best for OKR-First Organizations Wanting Structure and Simplicity

What it is: A Hamburg-based strategy execution platform that routes everything through a visual strategy map, connecting company direction to team-level OKRs and KPIs.

Key strengths:

• A focused strategy execution platform connecting OKRs and KPIs to visual strategy maps, designed for teams that want clarity and fast adoption
• Vince AI Coach, launched in January 2026, gives teams an embedded AI assistant that answers methodology questions, reviews draft OKRs, and suggests improvements directly inside the product
• Actively developed: Perdoo has shipped monthly releases throughout 2025 and 2026, expanding integrations and deepening strategy visualization

Limitations: Limitations surface when organizations need to deviate from a strict OKR process - teams running Balanced Scorecards, hybrid frameworks, or custom goal taxonomies will find Perdoo's OKR-centric model harder to adapt. Microsoft integrations are functional but not deeply native.

Migration ease: ⭐⭐⭐ Moderate; free plan available for initial evaluation.

Best fit: Mid-market organizations new to OKRs that want a structured, methodology-faithful platform with a clear learning path.

4. Mooncamp - Best for Teams-Heavy Organizations Migrating from Viva Goals

What it is: A modern, highly configurable OKR platform from Germany, built for fast-growing and mid-market companies with strong GDPR compliance credentials. Mooncamp has become one of the leading migration destinations for teams leaving Microsoft Viva Goals in 2025 and 2026.

Key strengths:

• Deepest Microsoft Teams workflow integration of any mid-market platform - full OKR creation, updates, and cycle switching without leaving Teams
• Strong goal alignment features with particular attention to GDPR compliance and European business needs
• Flexible custom dashboards and real-time reporting
• Dedicated Viva Goals migration support

Limitations: Less suited to very large enterprises with complex governance structures, multiple organizational layers, or regulated-industry compliance requirements beyond standard GDPR.

Migration ease: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Dedicated Viva Goals migration support; strong documentation.

Best fit: Mid-market teams (200-2,000 employees) deeply embedded in Microsoft Teams who want the most seamless Viva Goals-like workflow experience.

5. Profit.co - Best for Feature-Dense Execution Across the Full OKR Stack

What it is: A US-based platform that wraps OKRs in task management, project portfolio tools, performance reviews, and employee engagement modules.

Key strengths:

• A feature-dense execution platform combining OKRs with task management, project portfolio tools, performance reviews, and employee engagement modules
• Eight OKR view types including heatmap, scorecard, hierarchy, and Gantt
• Dual-license tier model splitting users into Full Access and Read-Only categories for cost-effective organization-wide visibility
• AI-powered goal suggestions and key-result-level risk tracking

Limitations: US-centric data hosting (SOC 2, not ISO 27001 or TISAX). Interface complexity can overwhelm teams new to OKRs. Enterprise pricing requires a sales conversation.

Migration ease: ⭐⭐⭐ Moderate; free tier available for up to 100 users.

Best fit: US-centric organizations that want an all-in-one execution platform covering OKRs, tasks, and portfolio management in one tool.

6. Betterworks - Best for HR-Led OKR + Performance Management

What it is: Betterworks combines OKR goal-setting with performance reviews, feedback loops, and calibration in a single platform - targeting enterprise HR teams that want goals connected to talent processes rather than a standalone strategy tool.

Key strengths:

• In January 2026, Betterworks launched NextGen, a complete platform rebuild on containerized microservices, introducing AI Assist for goal writing, check-ins, and performance summaries, along with 400+ new features
• Multi-level calibration at scale: automated calibration workflows handle rating debates across business units - when 2,000+ employees are reviewed simultaneously, Betterworks orchestrates the process across multiple manager levels
• Integrates with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Slack, Teams, Jira, and Salesforce

Limitations: SCIM provisioning is not supported - unusual for a platform targeting 2,500+ employee organizations. US-based (SOC 2 Type II, GDPR - not ISO 27001 or TISAX). No public pricing; minimum thresholds start at 500 employees (mid-market) and 2,500 employees (enterprise). The platform started as OKR-focused but has expanded heavily into HR, which can dilute the strategy execution experience.

Migration ease: ⭐⭐ Complex; expect 2-4 month implementation with significant change management.

Best fit: Large organizations where HR owns the goal-setting process and wants OKRs tightly integrated with performance reviews and talent calibration - particularly in the US.

7. Gtmhub / Quantive (Legacy) - No Longer Recommended

As noted above, Quantive was once a top enterprise OKR platform, but WorkBoard's acquisition in May 2025 means the standalone product is being phased out. Evaluating Quantive today means evaluating WorkBoard - see option 2 above.

If you were mid-migration to Quantive when the acquisition happened, contact WorkBoard directly about your transition terms, or evaluate Workpath as an alternative to Quantive.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison Table

Find Your Best Match: Interactive Selector

Use this quick tool to identify the platform that best fits your specific situation - compliance requirements, organization size, and migration needs included.

The Viva Goals Migration Checklist: 6 Steps

Whether you're already on a new platform or still evaluating, this checklist applies. Each step is critical - skip one and you risk losing data or adoption.

The EU Compliance Question: Why It Matters More Than Most Lists Admit

Most OKR "alternatives" lists are written from a US-centric lens. For enterprises in the DACH region and broader EU, this creates a significant gap: the platform you choose must meet your data residency and security certification requirements, not just your feature wish list.

Here's what regulated EU organizations typically need:

• GDPR compliance with EU data residency (ideally Germany or EU DCs)
• ISO/IEC 27001 certification for information security management
• TISAX AL2 if you operate in or supply to the automotive sector
• Full audit trails and role-based access controls for procurement sign-off

Of the seven platforms in this guide, Workpath is the only one that meets all four requirements - with data hosted in German data centers, ISO 27001:2022 certification, TISAX AL2 certification, and complete GDPR compliance documentation available via the Workpath Trust Center.

If your procurement or IT security team will conduct a vendor assessment, this isn't a nice-to-have - it's a prerequisite. Starting your evaluation without checking compliance certifications first is one of the hidden traps of OKR software selection that wastes significant time late in the process.

How to Choose: Decision Framework

Rather than evaluating on features alone, use this outcome-first lens:

The 2026 AI-native platform buyer's guide covers how to structure a formal vendor evaluation, including scoring models and security checklists.

Why This Migration Is Actually an Opportunity

It's easy to frame a forced migration as a disruption. But consider what many Viva Goals users experienced: basic OKR tracking without deep analytics, limited AI support, and no direct connection between goals and operational data.

The platforms available in 2026 are materially more capable. Done right, this migration doesn't just replace what you had - it upgrades how your organization executes strategy.

Enterprise customers like DB Schenker achieved a 17% increase in goal achievement rates by moving to a purpose-built Outcome Management platform. The tools, the AI, and the enablement programs available today didn't exist when Viva Goals launched. This is the moment to put them to work.

Frequently Asked Questions