In May 2025, WorkBoard announced the acquisition of Quantive, merging two of the largest enterprise OKR platforms into one. For thousands of strategy and transformation leaders currently running on Quantive, that announcement triggered an immediate question: Do we follow the migration-or is this the moment to re-evaluate our tooling?
Quantive customers will transition to the WorkBoard platform over the coming months. That means a full product migration-and while some organizations may follow along, others are looking to regain control over their strategic tooling.
If you're in that second group, this guide is for you. We cover the 7 best Quantive alternatives in 2026-with honest assessments of key strengths, ideal company size, pricing models, OKR capabilities, and compliance posture-so you can make a confident, informed switch.
Quantive is no longer available as a standalone platform. Following WorkBoard's acquisition in May 2025, all Quantive customers are being migrated to the WorkBoard platform. If you're evaluating your options, now is the time to compare alternatives - before you're locked into a new long-term contract.
Why the Quantive-WorkBoard Deal Is Creating Real Uncertainty
Quantive, originally known as Gtmhub, built its reputation around OKRs, KPI tracking, and strategic alignment. The company rebranded in 2022 and positioned itself as a leader in results-oriented enterprise software. In May 2025, WorkBoard announced the acquisition and is now merging both platforms into one.
For enterprise buyers, three concerns stand out:
- UX and workflow disruption. WorkBoard has a different UX and execution philosophy-teams face retraining, new admin processes, and unfamiliar workflows, right in the middle of their OKR cycles.
- Data sovereignty risk. Quantive offered EU-hosted options. WorkBoard, headquartered in the U.S., may shift data hosting under U.S. jurisdiction. For GDPR-regulated or TISAX-certified organizations, this is a compliance red flag.
- Product roadmap ambiguity. With two product lines being merged and rebranded, there's real uncertainty around roadmap priorities, feature parity, and how much influence long-time Quantive customers will retain.
These aren't hypothetical concerns. They're the exact reasons we're seeing a significant wave of enterprise teams actively evaluating independent alternatives in 2026.
At a Glance: 7 Quantive Alternatives Compared
| Platform | Best For | Ideal Company Size | AI Capabilities | EU Compliance | Pricing Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 Workpath | Enterprise outcome management + EU compliance | 500-50,000+ | Native AI (OKR Gen, Quality Check, Agents) | ISO 27001, TISAX, GDPR | Custom enterprise |
| Betterworks | OKR + continuous performance management | 500-10,000+ | AI progress nudges, goal recommendations | SOC 2, GDPR | Custom enterprise |
| Perdoo | Structured OKR + KPI alignment, mid-market | 50-5,000 | Basic AI assist | GDPR (EU-hosted) | Freemium; from €8/user/mo |
| Mooncamp | Intuitive OKR + MS Teams integration | 50-5,000 | AI goal suggestions | GDPR (EU-hosted) | From ~€8/user/mo |
| Leapsome | OKR + full HR people enablement | 200-5,000 | AI goal creation, progress summaries | GDPR, SOC 2 | Custom; from ~$8/user/mo |
| Profit.co | OKR templates + task management | 50-2,000 | AI OKR suggestions | SOC 2, GDPR | Free up to 5 users; custom |
| Weekdone | Weekly check-ins, lightweight OKR tracking | 3-500 | Basic AI features | GDPR (Estonia-based) | Free ≤3 users; from ~$87/mo |
The 7 Best Quantive Alternatives in 2026
1. 🥇 Workpath - Best Enterprise-Grade, AI-Native Alternative
If you're running a large or mid-to-large enterprise and need more than a goal tracker, Workpath is the most complete Quantive alternative available in 2026. Workpath is a German-based, enterprise-grade strategy execution platform built for complexity-trusted by companies like SAP, Bosch, Deutsche Post DHL, and Lufthansa. Unlike top-down OKR tools, Workpath helps organizations steer strategy across multiple levels and teams-horizontally and vertically.
What sets Workpath apart is its full Outcome Management stack: OKRs, KPIs, Initiatives, Analytics, and AI-all in one platform. It supports OKRs, KPIs, initiatives, and strategic programs in a unified way, not just OKRs in isolation.
Key strengths:
- AI-native architecture: The Workpath AI suite includes an OKR Generator, Quality Checker, and AI Agents that automate drafting, scoring, and progress monitoring-no bolt-on AI features
- Analytics Suite: Real-time dashboards, automated business review packages, and variance analysis for executive reporting
- Enterprise compliance: Workpath holds ISO 27001:2022, TISAX AL2, GDPR, and SOC 2 Type II certifications-the strongest compliance profile in the OKR category, covering even automotive and defense-adjacent regulated industries
- Deep integrations: Native connectors for Jira, SAP, MS Teams, Power BI, and Azure DevOps
- Dedicated migration program: Full-service migration from Quantive including data mapping, structure replication, parallel run, and commercial credits for your remaining contract term (typically 4-6 weeks)
- Proven enablement: OKR Masterclass, AI Bootcamp, KPI Mastery, and a certified consulting partner network
Results speak for themselves. DB Schenker increased its goal achievement rate by 17% after implementing OKR-based Outcome Management with Workpath. See the full DB Schenker case study for details.
Ideal company size: 500-50,000+ employees Pricing: Custom enterprise (Core & Advanced packages)-explore pricing Best fit: Large European enterprises in manufacturing, logistics, automotive, energy, and regulated industries that need a complete strategy-to-outcome operating model with the strongest available compliance posture.
2. Betterworks - Best for OKR + Continuous Performance Management
Betterworks takes a different angle from most pure-play OKR tools: it embeds goal management directly into a continuous performance management system. Goal progress links to ongoing feedback and development conversations, ensuring OKRs aren't just administrative tasks but integral to employee growth-designed for organizations shifting to frequent performance touchpoints.
This makes Betterworks compelling for HR-led transformations where OKRs need to connect to talent development and performance reviews. It's less focused on the deep analytics and strategy-level steering that Quantive users often depended on.
Key strengths:
- Enterprise OKR cascading: Align goals from the board level through every layer with visual dependency mapping and automatic rollup calculations
- AI-driven progress nudges: Machine learning identifies stalled goals and sends targeted reminders, reducing the manual overhead of tracking update cadences
- Strong calibration and continuous feedback loops
Limitations: No public pricing; deeper HR focus may not suit strategy/transformation-led deployments; less robust analytics compared to Workpath or Quantive.
Ideal company size: Mid-to-large enterprises (500-10,000+ employees) that need sophisticated goal alignment and calibration tools, particularly those transitioning from annual to continuous performance management. Pricing: Custom enterprise (no public pricing) Best fit: Organizations that want OKRs tightly integrated with performance reviews and development conversations.
3. Perdoo - Best Structured OKR Platform for European Mid-Market
Perdoo is a Germany-based OKR and strategy execution platform with a strong reputation for making structured goal management accessible. It combines OKRs, KPIs, and strategy mapping in a single system, with a clean, intuitive interface that lowers the barrier for companies new to the OKR framework.
Perdoo is best for growing companies that need strategic alignment features and real-time tracking. It won't replace Quantive's analytics depth for power users, but for teams that primarily used Quantive for structured OKR management, Perdoo is a natural, lower-friction migration target.
Key strengths:
- Strategy map to visualize how company-wide objectives break down into actionable goals; OKR & KPI integration for a comprehensive view
- EU-hosted, GDPR-compliant
- Transparent freemium pricing model
Limitations: Limited advanced analytics; customization options are constrained for very large enterprise deployments.
Ideal company size: 50-5,000 employees Pricing: Free up to 5 users; paid tiers from €8/user/month Best fit: Mid-market European companies needing structured OKR + KPI management without enterprise complexity.
4. Mooncamp - Best for Intuitive UX and MS Teams Integration
Mooncamp is a German-built OKR platform that prioritizes configurability and adoption. Its streamlined interface focuses on core OKR functions, enabling rapid adoption and reducing barriers to effective goal management-especially for teams new to OKRs or seeking minimal complexity.
Where Mooncamp differentiates is interface quality and customization. It matches Quantive's reporting depth with a far more intuitive interface and full customization. It's particularly well-suited to organizations that struggled with Quantive's learning curve and want a cleaner user experience.
Key strengths:
- Highly intuitive, visually clean interface
- Strong MS Teams integration
- Flexible, customizable OKR framework support
- EU-hosted, GDPR-compliant
Limitations: No mobile app; less suited for very large enterprise deployments with complex multi-tenant governance requirements.
Ideal company size: 50-5,000 employees Pricing: From approximately €8/user/month Best fit: Mid-market organizations and scale-ups that want an intuitive, configurable OKR tool with strong EU compliance and MS Teams integration.
5. Leapsome - Best for People-Centric Organizations
Leapsome takes the broadest approach on this list, combining OKR management with performance reviews, engagement surveys, and learning tools. OKR progress informs performance evaluations, engagement data shapes goal-setting, and learning paths address gaps in achieving key results-suited to organizations aiming to align goal management with employee development.
The trade-off is depth: if you're serious about strategy execution, Leapsome falls short. Features like auto-updating goals via integrations, multi-level hierarchy, or detailed OKR progress reporting are missing entirely. You're paying for a people platform that happens to have goals, not a goals platform.
Key strengths:
- AI Goal Creation: Leapsome's AI generates OKRs that follow best practices, suggests initiatives, and summarizes progress
- Goals automatically feed into 1:1s and performance reviews-no system switching required
- Strong GDPR compliance; Berlin-based
Limitations: OKR features are less mature than dedicated platforms; more complex to administer; no public pricing.
Ideal company size: 200-5,000 employees Pricing: Custom; individual modules from approximately $8-11/user/month Best fit: Mid-sized to large organizations (200-5,000 employees) that want to integrate goal tracking with performance reviews, engagement surveys, and employee development in a single platform-particularly European companies requiring strong GDPR compliance.
6. Profit.co - Best for OKR Templates + Task Integration
Profit.co offers an accessible, template-rich OKR platform that combines goal management with task tracking and built-in recognition features. It's a strong option for teams that want OKRs plus adjacent management workflows, especially where integrations and task support matter more than simplicity.
It's one of the more affordable options on this list, with a functional free tier for small teams. However, it lacks the enterprise governance, analytics depth, and compliance certifications that larger organizations typically require.
Key strengths:
- Extensive OKR template library to accelerate rollout
- Built-in task management and employee recognition
- Free tier available for small teams
- Solid integration library
Limitations: Interface feels dated; analytics are basic; limited enterprise governance features.
Ideal company size: 50-2,000 employees Pricing: Free up to 5 users; custom pricing for larger deployments Best fit: Mid-market teams that want practical OKR templates and task management integration without a large budget.
7. Weekdone - Best for Lightweight Weekly OKR Tracking
Weekdone is the most lightweight option on this list, purpose-built around a weekly check-in cadence. It emphasizes frequent, concise updates to keep OKRs on track-employees share accomplishments, challenges, and next steps, all automatically linked to their OKRs.
For small to mid-sized teams that primarily want a structured weekly rhythm around goals, Weekdone is highly accessible. For enterprises moving from Quantive, it would represent a significant step down in capability.
Key strengths:
- Simple, consistent weekly PPP (Plans, Progress, Problems) framework
- Easy onboarding and built-in OKR coaching
- Affordable, transparent pricing
- Estonia-based, GDPR-compliant
Limitations: Weekdone's official product updates page has not published new entries since March 2023. No major feature announcements have surfaced in nearly three years-a product velocity concern for organizations evaluating long-term platform partners.
Ideal company size: 3-500 employees Pricing: Free up to 3 users; from approximately $87/month for teams of up to 10 Best fit: Small teams and SMBs needing lightweight, affordable OKR tracking with a weekly cadence structure.
Use the Interactive Selector to Find Your Best Fit
Answer 5 quick questions about your organization to get a personalized platform recommendation-no sales call required.
What to Prioritize When Switching from Quantive
If you're actively evaluating a move, choosing the best OKR software for enterprises in 2026 requires more than comparing feature lists. Here's what former Quantive users should focus on:
- Data migration quality - Can the vendor replicate your existing OKR structure, hierarchy, and historical progress data? Ask for a migration proof-of-concept before signing.
- Analytics continuity - Quantive was strong on analytics. Don't accept a downgrade without a plan. Workpath's Analytics Suite and Mooncamp are the strongest alternatives here.
- EU data residency - If your organization is GDPR-regulated or TISAX-certified, confirm where your data will be hosted. US-based vendors require additional due diligence.
- Adoption investment - Switching platforms mid-cycle is hard. Prioritize vendors with structured enablement programs (training, coaching, bootcamps) to reduce the productivity dip.
- AI roadmap, not just AI features - Several platforms have added superficial AI features. Ask vendors to demo AI that directly impacts your workflow-OKR quality, progress signals, automated reporting.
For a deeper head-to-head comparison between Workpath and Quantive/WorkBoard, see our dedicated Workpath vs. Quantive comparison.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Quantive shutting down entirely?
Quantive is not being shut down outright, but it is being merged into the WorkBoard platform. As of May 2025, all Quantive customers are being transitioned to WorkBoard over a period of months. The standalone Quantive product will eventually be discontinued, meaning organizations must either follow the migration to WorkBoard or switch to an independent alternative.
Do I need to migrate urgently from Quantive?
You should plan your migration within the next 3-6 months. WorkBoard has announced a managed transition program, but once the Quantive platform is sunset, you will lose access to historical data if you haven't exported or migrated it. Evaluate your alternatives now so you can run a proper pilot before your next OKR cycle.
Is Workpath a good alternative for former Quantive customers?
Yes - especially for European enterprises. Workpath offers a dedicated Quantive migration program including data transfer, structure replication, onboarding support, and commercial credits for your remaining contract term. It is ISO 27001, TISAX AL2, and GDPR certified, and provides a more complete outcome management stack than most alternatives.
What makes Workpath different from other Quantive alternatives?
Workpath is the only platform in this list that combines native AI (OKR Generator, Quality Checker, AI Agents), a full Analytics Suite for business reviews and executive reporting, TISAX AL2 certification for regulated industries, and a comprehensive enablement program (OKR Masterclass, AI Bootcamp, KPI Mastery). It is purpose-built for large, complex organizations - not just mid-market teams.
Which Quantive alternative is best for a mid-sized company (under 500 employees)?
For teams under 500 employees, Perdoo and Mooncamp are both strong EU-based options with transparent pricing and solid OKR capabilities. If you also need people management and HR features, Leapsome is worth evaluating. For lightweight weekly tracking, Weekdone is the most accessible entry point.
How long does a migration from Quantive to a new platform typically take?
Most migrations take 4-6 weeks when supported by a vendor's migration team. This includes data mapping, historical data export, user provisioning, and a parallel run period. Workpath's white-glove migration service covers all of these steps and typically includes a dedicated Customer Success manager throughout the transition.
